| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
elmariachi33
Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 6
|
 Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 5:07 pm Post subject: Butterfly effect 2 |
 |
|
I've been getting alot of random films on Netflix because I have to one where I can get 4 at a time. I just rented "The Butterfly effect 2" for pure entertainment purposes. Although it wasn't by any means great, I didn't think it was bad at all... After watchng the trailer, I thought it was a blatant rip-off of the first one. However, after I saw it, I was pleasant surprised that i was wrong, it was it's own film all together. By no means am i saying that it was a great movie, but I guess I went in expecting the worst and actually didn't mind it.
And lets not forget that chick from "Smallville" who's in it. I think I like her alot already |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suicide Snowman
Joined: 22 Mar 2007
Posts: 92
Location: Russia Federassia^^
|
| Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 8:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| First was better. Anyway. Second is looks like first. nothing new. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
movielover
Joined: 06 Apr 2007
Posts: 33
Location: St. Petersburg, Florida
|
| Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 3:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The Butterfly Effect was surprisingly good (don't like Ashton) and I rented the sequel from Netflix. The original was far superior. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ilkenny
Joined: 26 Apr 2007
Posts: 10
|
| Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 2:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i must say i did not like the second one...
like others say nothing new... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hektor133
Joined: 20 May 2007
Posts: 3
|
| Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 12:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| First part was brilliant! I haven't watched second, but I heard that is definitely worse... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
aladdinring.com
Joined: 27 May 2007
Posts: 21
Location: HK
|
| Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| the first is better |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
artspeedz
Joined: 01 Jun 2007
Posts: 69
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
artspeedz
Joined: 01 Jun 2007
Posts: 69
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 1:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| yes. first is better |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pickels
Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 85
Location: Chicago, IL
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 4:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| never seen it |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GloriaJeans
Joined: 29 Jan 2007
Posts: 20
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 12:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| First one was definitely better, although it was TWISTED. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
theartist
Joined: 06 Apr 2007
Posts: 103
Location: Almere, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 7:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| First was great... dont like Ashton at all, but he played the part very good. Second is just like scream 2, i will never forget what you did that summer (or something like it) etc etc more of the same and by far never as good as the firstone was. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
phoketztight
Joined: 19 Jun 2007
Posts: 2
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 10:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| First Was Better Just My 2 Cents |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
knownreason
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 14
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 2:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
First one was better because it had a better well planned plot. I've yet to see a movie that was as good as the 2nd one, besides underworld, that one was good  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
