Pathfinder

williamwallace9 · Joined: 06 Apr 2007 Posts: 2

Is anyone else as souped as I am about Pathfinder coming out? This movie looks like it's going to be badass as hell. If you do know what it's about here's a little summary.

Vikings come to North America and slaughter a bunch of Native Americans. They leave behind a viking child, who grows up with the Native Americans and learns how to be badass. Vikings return, and shit goes down.

Anyway, if anyone else knows anything else about Pathfinder or knows where to find more info on it, let me know.

[EDIT BY MODERATOR]Removed link to your own site.[/EDIT]

nuveinblog · Joined: 07 Mar 2007 Posts: 12

I voted for better, only because I was really disappointed with "300".

cougar · Joined: 06 Apr 2007 Posts: 1

none of them is better, they're both worse.

julievive · Joined: 10 Apr 2007 Posts: 64

For me I like the 300, because it show's there how the 300 warriors have been into a fight just to save Spartan people, it’s just like a fight for freedom. Anyway, both of us have our own opinion. Razz

__________________________

"Your Outsourcing Partner in Visual Effects"

Riddick · Joined: 12 Apr 2007 Posts: 3

Both films are extremely fake.
almost 80% of 300 is digitaly planted.
It's a digital cartoon, but the story and directing are premium.

julievive · Joined: 10 Apr 2007 Posts: 64

Of course it’s digitally planted because these days we are now in a high technology. I think all movies now are using high end technology, video editing, some of the scene are been rotoscoped. 90% of the movies now are not that real as before hehehehe Wink

__________________________

"Your Outsourcing Partner in Visual Effects"

Riddick · Joined: 12 Apr 2007 Posts: 3

Then why are there actual acters involved in the movie?
There could be anyone in the background making, and it would be much cheaper for the producers.

Riddick · Joined: 12 Apr 2007 Posts: 3

Happy Feet is a good example of a background made movie.